Fifth Circuit Rules Geofence Warrants Categorically Unconstitutional — Implications for ALPR
In United States v. Smith, the Fifth Circuit held that geofence warrants are categorically unconstitutional because they search everyone in an area rather than a specific suspect. The reasoning has direct implications for ALPR networks that similarly surveil all vehicles passing through an area without individualized suspicion.
Read Full Article at Electronic Frontier Foundation →
Articles can sometimes be removed or moved. If the link above no longer works, view an archived copy on the Wayback Machine.