← Back to articles
Legal

Fifth Circuit Rules Geofence Warrants Categorically Unconstitutional — Implications for ALPR

Electronic Frontier Foundation · EFF Staff · August 1, 2024

In United States v. Smith, the Fifth Circuit held that geofence warrants are categorically unconstitutional because they search everyone in an area rather than a specific suspect. The reasoning has direct implications for ALPR networks that similarly surveil all vehicles passing through an area without individualized suspicion.

geofencefourth-amendmentfifth-circuitcourt-rulingprecedent