What the Norfolk Case Gets Wrong About ALPRs
Legal analysis critiquing the Schmidt v. City of Norfolk ruling that upheld 176 Flock cameras as constitutional. Argues the court misapplied Carpenter v. United States by treating analysis rather than collection as the constitutional trigger. Warns that if the reasoning stands, governments will be free to collect and analyze large-scale location data without warrants.
Read Full Article at Independent Institute →
Articles can sometimes be removed or moved. If the link above no longer works, view an archived copy on the Wayback Machine.